Profit Sharing Plans:
A New
Comparability Profit Sharing Plan is a plan design created from recent
nondiscrimination regulations published by the IRS. The result is flexibility
never before seen in the allowable methods of allocating the firm’s profit
sharing contribution among the plan participants. This type of plan, therefore,
enjoys certain advantages over the traditional Profit Sharing Plan that is worth
exploring for small business owners.
What
are the advantages of a New Comparability Profit Sharing Plan over a traditional
Defined Benefit Pension Plan?
A
New Comparability Profit Sharing Plan:
- allows
different allocations among different groups of plan participants;
- may
allow groups to be determined by salary, service, position, or even a
combination of these categories;
-
may allow the owner to receive a much larger allocation, as a percentage of
pay, than other plan participants;
- may
allow the owner to receive an allocation of up to 25% of salary into the plan
on an annual basis; and
- may
allow an owner to select those participants he would like to reward with
larger allocations.
What
requirements must be met to quality as a nondiscriminatory New Comparability
Plan?
The
design is referred to as a "cross-tested" type of profit sharing plan. The
discrimination testing is done by reviewing the projected benefits at
retirement for a given participant, as opposed to the traditional plan approach
of reviewing the contributions allocated to a participant’s account each year.
Under this newer type of design, the plan is not required to allocate the same
percentage of pay to all participants.
The
projected benefits of the highly compensated employees are averaged and compared
to the average projected benefits of all other employees. If the "comparison of
benefits" falls within a particular range, the plan will pass the mathematical
testing stipulated in the regulations to qualify as a nondiscriminatory plan.
The
flexibility allowed will be most pronounced if the key employees are, on
average, older than most of the other employees; therefore, a customized,
company specific feasibility study is required to ultimately determine the
allowable opportunities in plan design.
How
does the initial allocation of the New Comparability Plan contribution compare
to the allocation of a traditional Profit Sharing Plan? Below is a specific
example of the allowable plan allocations of a New Comparability Plan versus the
traditional Profit Sharing Plan approach1:
| |
|
|
Traditional |
|
New Comparability |
|
| |
|
|
Profit Sharing |
% of |
Profit Sharing |
% of |
| |
Age |
Salary |
Allocation |
Salary |
Allocation |
Salary |
|
OWNER Employee |
60 |
140,000 |
21,000 |
15% |
35,000 |
25% |
| Employee |
33 |
33,000 |
4,950 |
15% |
1,650 |
5% |
| Employee |
34 |
31,000 |
4,650 |
15% |
1,550 |
5% |
| Employee |
54 |
29,000 |
4,350 |
15% |
1,450 |
5% |
| Employee |
42 |
23,000 |
3,450 |
15% |
1,150 |
5% |
| Employee |
43 |
24,000 |
3,600 |
15% |
1,200 |
5% |
| |
|
280,000 |
42,000 |
|
42,000 |
|
|
Owners Share |
|
|
50% |
|
83% |
|
If your goal is a deduction for your business, and a secure retirement benefit
for yourself, the flexibility available in the New Comparability approach to
allocating profit sharing contributions is worth exploring. We would be happy
to provide you with a free look at a Profit Sharing Pension Plan using the New
Comparability Method for your specific business.
See also HYBRID PENSION PLANS - Click Here
1Allocations
are dependent upon the specific ages of the employees in the firm. The maximum
allocation allowed for highly compensated employees in a "top heavy" plan is 25%
of salary, and the minimum allowed for other employees is 3% of salary. The
allowable allocations necessary to meet the nondiscrimination requirements will
vary by employer group.
Disclaimer: The material discussed herein
is meant for general illustration or informational purposes only and is
not to be construed as financial advice. Although the information has been gathered from sources believed to
be reliable, it is not guaranteed. Please note that individual situations
can vary; therefore, the information contained herein should be relied upon only when
coordinated with individual professional advice. We are not licensed for
and therefore do not provide tax or legal advice.